Comparison of Prostatic Tissue Processed by Microwave and Conventional Technique Using Morphometry

Document Type: Original Research

Authors

1 Dept. of Pathology , University of Health Sciences , Rohtak, India

2 Dept. of Pathology, University Pt BDS PGIMS, Rohtak, India

10.7508/ijp.2015.01.001

Abstract

 Background and Objectives:Rapid processing of histopathological specimens and decreased turnaround time is important to fulfill the needs of clinicians treating sick patients, so the present study was conducted to compare the time taken and quality of sections in processing of prostatic tissue by rapid microwave and conventional techniques using morphometry. Methods: Four to five mm thick paired prostate tissue pieces of fifty cases of prostatectomy specimens were taken. One tissue piece of the pair was processed routinely overnight by conventional tissue processing and the other by microwave processing. Time taken for processing by both conventional technique and microwave technique was noted and compared. Then, both were stained with conventional method of hematoxylin and eosin staining and examined for histological typing and grading. Morphometric study was done on slides of prostatic tissue processed by both conventional and microwave technique. Result:The prostatectomy specimens included both benign (86%) and malignant (14%) prostatic lesions in the age range of 46-85 years. The time taken for steps of dehydration, clearing and impregnation in microwave technique was significantly less as compared to histoprocessing done by conventional technique. Morphology, staining patterns of prostatic tissue processed within minutes by microwave technique, whether benign or malignant, were comparable to those sections which were processed in days using standard technique. Conclusion:Domestic microwave oven can be used for histoprocessing to accelerate the processing with preservation of morphology and is cheaper than commercially available microwave ovens and processing time was considerably reduced from days to minutes.  

Keywords


  1. Kok LP, Visser PE, Boon ME. Histoprocessing with the microwave oven: an update. Histochem J 1988;20(6-7):323-8.
  2. Buesa RJ. Microwave-assisted tissue processing: real impact on the histology workflow. Ann Diagn Pathol 2007;11(3):206-11.
  3. Rohr LR, Layfield LJ, Wallin D, Hardy D. A comparison of routine and rapid microwave tissue processing in a surgical pathology laboratory. Quality of histologic sections and advantages of microwave processing. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115(5):703-8.
  4. Munkholm J, Talman ML, Hasselager T. Implementations of a new rapid tissue processing method- advantages and challenges. Pathol Res Pract 2008;204(12):899-904.
  5. Boon ME, Kok LP, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E. Microwave - stimulated diffusion for fast processing of tissue: reduced dehydrating, clearing, and impregnating times. Histopathology 1986;10(3):303-9.
  6. Rosai J. Rosai & Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. 9th ed. Missouri: Mosby;2004.
  7. Boon ME, Kok LP, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E. Microwave - stimulated diffusion for fast processing of tissue: reduced dehydrating, clearing, and impregnating times. Histopathology 1986;10(3):303-9.
  8. Leong AS, Price D. Incorporation of microwave tissue processing into a routine pathology laboratory: impact on turnaround times and laboratory work patterns. Pathology 2004;36(4):321-4.
  9. Leong AS. Microwaves and turnaround times in histoprocessing. Is this a new era in histotechnology. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121(4):460-2.
  10. Kayser K, Stute H, Lubcke J, Wazinski U. Rapid Microwave fixation – a comparative morphometric study. Histochem J 1988;20(6-7):347-52.
  11. Abdel-Khalek M, El-Baz M, Ibrahiem el-H. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model. BJU Int 2004;94(4):523-33.
  12. Stanley S. Raphael. Lynch’s Medical Laboratory Technology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders;1976.
  13. Bancroft JD, Marilyn G. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone;2002.
  14. Vaishali Suri, Chaturvedi S, Pant I, Dua R, Dua S. Application of domestic microwave for urgent histopathology reporting: an evaluation. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2006;49(3):348-51.
  15. Mayers CP. Histological fixation by microwave heating. J Clin Pathol 1970;23:273-6.
  16. Bernard GR. Microwave irradiation as a generator of heat for histological fixation. Stain Technol 1978;22:435-44.
  17. Petrere JA, Schardein JL. Microwave fixation for fetal specimens. Stain Technol 1997;55:71-7.
  18. Leong AS-Y, Daymon ME, Milios J. Microwave irradiation as a form of fixation for light and electron microscopy. J Pathol 1985;146:313-21.
  19. Leong AS. Applications of microwave irradiation in histopathology. Pathol Annu 1988;23:213-34.
  20. Kok LP, Boon ME, Suurmeijer AJ. Major improvement in microscopic image quality of cryostat sections: combining freezing and microwave stimulated fixation. Am J Clin Pathol 1987;88:620-3.
  21. Chaudhari K, Chattopadhyay A, Dutta SK. Microwave technique in histopathology and its comparison with conventional technique. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2000;43(4):387-94.
  22. Morales AR, Nassiri M, Kanhoush R, Vincek V, Nadgi M. Experience with an automated microwave-assisted rapid tissue processing method: validation of histologic quality and impact on the timeliness of diagnostic surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121(4):528-36.
  23. Pienta KJ, Coffey DS. Correlation of nuclear morphometry with progression of breast cancer. Cancer 1991; 68: 2012-6.