Optimizing HER2/neu Detection in Equivocal (Score +2) Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) via Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH): A Single-Center Experience

Document Type : Original Research

Author

Department of Dental Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

10.30699/ijp.2026.2073749.3555
Abstract
Background & Objective: Breast cancer is a major global health concern, with HER2/neu overexpression observed in 15%-20% of cases, often indicating a more aggressive disease. It is important to accurately assess HER2 status using IHC and confirm it with FISH testing to guide targeted therapy decisions. The goal of this study was to improve HER2/neu detection in equivocal breast cancer cases, determine the rate of amplification in score +2 cases using FISH, and evaluate the correlation between FISH results and patient demographics such as age.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 336 archived breast cancer cases with equivocal HER2/neu IHC scores (+2) from 2018 to 2024. IHC initially assessed HER2 expression, and ZytoLight® SPEC ERBB2/CEN 17 probes were used for FISH confirmation. Cases were classified into 5 ASCO-CAP 2023-defined groups based on HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 copy number. Final HER2 status guided clinical decision-making regarding eligibility for targeted therapy.
Results: The majority of patients were female (91.1%) and aged 40-49 years (29.2%). HER2-negative status was most prevalent (71.1%), while 24.4% were HER2-positive. A significant association was found between gender and HER2 status (P = 0.002), with males showing higher HER2 positivity. A HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 was strongly associated with HER2 amplification (P = 0.0001).
Conclusion: A significant association was observed between ERBB2 expression and gender, particularly with the HER2/CEP17 ratio, highlighting the importance of molecular profiling. Most patients (71.1%) belonged to Group 5, indicating HER2 negativity. These findings emphasize the clinical importance of precise HER2 testing, particularly in equivocal and male cases.

Keywords

Subjects


1.      Xu L, Xie Y, Gou Q, Cai R, Bao R, Huang Y, et al. HER2-targeted therapies for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: present and future. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1446414. [DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1446414] [PMID] [PMCID]
2.      Wang Q, Wang X, Yang Y. Advances in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancers: a narrative review. Gland Surg. 2022;11(8):1415-23. [DOI:10.21037/gs-22-439] [PMID] [PMCID]
3.      Albanyahyati B, El Hadi H, Bakri Y, Benider A, Karkouri M, et al. Prospective validation of a one-step RT-qPCR-based test for quantifying HER2 gene expression in breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024;25(11):3885-94. [DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.11.3885] [PMID] [PMCID]
4.      Alizi S, Kareem TA, Hussein TA, Muaed A. Frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations among Iraqi non-small cell lung cancer patients. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2022;12(3):961-4. [DOI:10.25258/ijddt.12.3.06]
5.      Liu Y, Wu S, Shi X, Mao F, Zeng X. Breast cancer with a HER2 IHC2+ and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 and an average HER2 gene copy number <4.0 per tumor cell: HER2 mRNA overexpression is a rare event. Front Oncol. 2020;10:985. [DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.00985] [PMID] [PMCID]
6.      Wu SF, Liu YY, Liu XD, Jiang Y, Luo YF, Cui QC, et al. [HER2 gene status and mRNA expression in immunohistochemistry 1+ breast cancer]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018;47(7):522-6. Chinese.
7.      Patil Okaly GV, Panwar D, Lingappa KB, Kumari P, Anand A, Kumar P, et al. FISH and HER2/neu equivocal immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. Indian J Cancer. 2019;56(2):119-23. [DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_333_18] [PMID]
8.      Agersborg S, Mixon C, Nguyen T, Aithal S, Sudarsanam S, Blocker F, et al. Immunohistochemistry and alternative FISH testing in breast cancer with HER2 equivocal amplification. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(2):321-8. [DOI:10.1007/s10549-018-4755-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
9.      College of American Pathologists. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer - 2023 guideline update [Internet]. Northfield (IL): College of American Pathologists; c2023 [cited 2025 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.cap.org/protocols-and-guidelines/cap-guidelines/current-cap-guidelines/recommendations-for-human-epidermal-growth-factor-2-testing-in-breast-cancer.
10.    Vermeulen JF, Kornegoor R, van der Wall E, van der Groep P, van Diest PJ. Differential expression of growth factor receptors and membrane-bound tumor markers for imaging in male and female breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53353. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0053353] [PMID] [PMCID]
11.    Giordano SH. Breast cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2311-20. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra1707939] [PMID]
12.    Mills SE, editor. Histology for pathologists. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019.
13.    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. [DOI:10.3322/caac.21492] [PMID]
14.    El Saghir NS, Khalil MK, Eid T, El Kinge AR, Charafeddine M, Geara F, et al. Trends in epidemiology and management of breast cancer in developing Arab countries: a literature and registry analysis. Int J Surg. 2007;5(4):225-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.015] [PMID]
15.    Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(11):1364-82. [DOI:10.5858/arpa.2018-0902-SA] [PMID]
16.    Keshavarz-Fathi M, Rezaei N. Cancer immunoprevention: current status and future directions. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2021;69(1):3. [DOI:10.1007/s00005-021-00604-x] [PMID]
17.    Sonnenblick A, Agbor-Tarh D, de Azambuja E, Hultsch S, Izquierdo M, Liu M, et al. STAT3 activation in HER2-positive breast cancers: analysis of data from a large prospective trial. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(6):1529-35. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.33385] [PMID]
18.    Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LA, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):dju055. [DOI:10.1093/jnci/dju055] [PMID] [PMCID]
19.    Zhou R, Yu L, Zhou S, Li CH, Yan S, Zheng G. Male breast carcinoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characterization study. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(10):6852-61.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 20 February 2026

  • Receive Date 25 October 2025
  • Revise Date 17 December 2025
  • Accept Date 03 February 2026