Document Type: Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Community Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

10.30699/ijp.2020.99403.1980

Abstract

Background & Objective: Accurate and timely reporting of critical values is an important issue. There is some doubt whether repeat testing of critical values would offer any advantage over single testing or not. The aim of this study was evaluation of utility of routine repeat testing of critical values in our referral center and to compare probable variations in different working shifts.
Methods: Clinical results of serum Potassium, Calcium, Blood Hemoglobin and Prothrombin Time (INR: International Normalized Ratio) were evaluated for three months.
Results: Totally, 178, 96, 67 and 107 consecutive critical values for Potassium, Calcium, Hemoglobin and INR were reported, respectively. In potassium and Hemoglobin 5.05% and 1.17% of retest runs exceeded the acceptable tolerance limit. All of the calcium retest results were within the acceptable limit. For INR, 21/107 retest results did not meet the acceptable tolerance limit, nine still were critical. Afternoon working run performance was significantly better than the two others.
Conclusion: Our observation suggests that routine repeat of hematology and chemistry critical test result is not necessary and may adversely affect patient safety measure. However, attention should be paid to results greater than analytical measurement range and all such results should be repeated before reporting.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Genzen J.R. and Tormey C.A. Pathology cosultation on reporting of critical values. Am J Clin Pathol, 2011. 135: 505-513. [DOI:10.1309/AJCP9IZT7BMBCJRS] [PMID] [PMCID]
  2. Motie PB, Zare-Mirzaie A, Shayanfar N, Kadivar M. Does routine repeat testing of critical laboratory values improve their accuracy?. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015;29:176.
  3. Toll AD, Liu JM, Gulati G, Behling EM, Kocher WD. Does routine repeat testing of critical values offer any advantage over single testing?. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2011 Apr;135(4):440-4.
  4. College of American Pathologists(2010) Laboratory Generak Checklist(components GEN.41320, GEN.41330 and GEN.41340).
  5. The Joint Commission. Accreditation Programm (2012) Laboratory, 2012 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG.02.03.01).
  6. International Organization for Standardization (2007) ISO 15189: 2007, Medical laboratories-Particular requirements for quality and competence.
  7. Yang D., Zhou Y., and Yang C.Analysis of laboratory repeat critical values at a large tertiary teaching hospital in china. Plosone, 2013. 8(3): e59518. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0059518] [PMID] [PMCID]
  8. Lehman C.M., Howanitz P. J., Soures R., Karcher D. S. Utility of repeat testing of critical values, A Q-probe analysis of 86 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2014. 138: 788-93. [DOI:10.5858/arpa.2013-0140-CP] [PMID]
  9. Campbell C.A. and Horvath A.R.Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine. Clinica Chimica Acta 2014. 432:135-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.004] [PMID]
  10. Niu A., yan X., wang L., Min Y., Hu C. Utility and necessity of repeat testing of critical values in the clinical chemistry laboratory. Plosone, 2013. 8(11): p. e80663. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080663] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Dighe AS, Jones JB, Parham S, Lewandrowski KB. Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false-positive critical value results. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2008 Oct;132(10):1666-71.
  12. Onyenekwu C.P., Hudson C.L., Zemlin A.E., Erasmus R.T. The impact of repeat -testing of common chemistry analytes at critical concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2014. 52(12): p. 1739-45. [DOI:10.1515/cclm-2014-0331] [PMID]
  13. Dighe A.S., Rao A., Coakley A.B., Lewandroski K.B. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006. 125: 758-64. [DOI:10.1309/R53XVC2U5CH6TNG8] [PMID]
  14. Zhou F, Zhao B, Gu D. Evaluation of laboratory critical serum potassium values and their association with clinical symptoms in Chinese Han patients. Journal of International Medical Research. 2015 Dec;43(6):851-61. DOI:10.1177/0300060515576011. [DOI:10.1177/0300060515576011] [PMID]
  15. Kost GJ. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers.JAMA.1990;263(5):704-707 [DOI:10.1001/jama.263.5.704] [PMID]
  16. Deetz CO, Noalan DK, Scott MG. An examination of usefullness of repeat testing practices in a large hospital clinical chemistry laboratory.Am J Clin Pathol,2012. 137:20-25 [DOI:10.1309/AJCPWPBF62YGEFOR] [PMID]
  17. Julie A. Hammerling.A review of medical errors in laboratory diagnostics and where we are today. Labmedicine,2012. 43(2):41-44 [DOI:10.1309/LM6ER9WJR1IHQAUY]
  18. Piva E, Plebani M. From "panic" to "critical" values:Which path toward harmonization?Clin Chem Lab Med,2013.51:2069-71 [DOI:10.1515/cclm-2013-0459] [PMID]
  19. Chima H.S.,Ramarajan V., Bhansali D. Is it necessary to repeat critical values in the laboratory?Todays technology may have the answer. Lab Med, 2009. 40(8):453-7. [DOI:10.1309/LMMY883OKBZQQBKU]
  20. Munoz O. Workload efficiency in the hematology laboratory (masters thesis). Salt Lake City,UT:University of Utah;2008.
  21. Bruna Claudia B. Rocha, Jose Adilson R. Alves, Felix Pedro D. Pinto, Maria Elizabete Mendes, Nairo M. Sumita. The critical value concept in clinical laboratory. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab,2016. 52(1). [DOI:10.5935/1676-2444.20160008]
  22. Howanitz JH, Howanitz PJ. Evaluation of total serum calcium critical values. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2006. 130:828-30
  23. Howanitz JH, Howanitz PJ. Evaluation of serum and whole blood sodium critical values. Am J Clin Pathol,2007. 127:56-9 [DOI:10.1309/Q3Y27QQLEL19340A] [PMID]
  24. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, et al.Current databases on biological variation:pros,cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999. 59:491-500 [DOI:10.1080/00365519950185229] [PMID]
  25. westgard JO. CLIA requirements/tables on CLIA proficiency testing criteria for acceptable analytical performance