Incidentally Detected Blue Nevus of Endocervix: a Case Report

Document Type: Case Reports

Authors

1 Dept. of Pathology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India

2 Dept of pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal India

10.7508/ijp.2015.03.012

Abstract

Blue nevi are uncommon, asymptomatic lesions of the uterine cervix. These lesions are not often detected clinically or on colposcopy. Careful histopathological examination is required. The nevus cells are said to originate from the immature melanoblasts of the neural crest. These lesions need to be differentiated from malignant melanoma and melanosis of the cervix. We present here a case report of incidentally detected cervical blue nevus in a 52 year old lady.   How to cite this article: Talengala Bhat S, Shivamurthy A, Calicut Kini Rao A. Incidentally Detected Blue Nevus of Endocervix: a Case Report. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10(3):248-52.

Keywords


Introduction

Blue nevi are benign melanocytic skin lesions and histologically represent diffuse proliferation of spindle shaped melanocytes. They are uncommon in the cervix (1, 2). The other extracutaneous sites of occurrence include the vagina, spermatic cord, prostate, pulmonary hilus, orbit, oral mucosa, oesophagus, maxillary sinus and lymph nodes. These pigmented lesions are derived from immature melanoblasts migrating from the neural crest to the mullerian tract during embryonic life (1, 3, 4).

The first two cases of pigmented cervical lesions were observed in 1883 and were reported by Bland-sutton (5) in 1922, who described them in women with uterine prolapse (5, 6). Being rare lesions, the actual incidence has been difficult to determine. Uehara et al. (7) estimated an over-all incidence of up to 28.6% in their case series, while Patel et al. (8) had earlier noted the incidence of blue nevi to be 0.12–1.9%. Some authors have also noted the existence of racial differences in the prevalence of this entity.

Clinically, patients with blue nevi of the endocervix are asymptomatic. These lesions are usually incidental findings detected histologically on surgical or biopsy specimens obtained for other purposes such as dysfunctional uterine bleeding, leiomyoma or prolapse (1, 2, 9, 10).

Here in, we present a case report of endocervical blue nevus in a 52 year old woman.

 

Case Report

A 52 year old woman (gravida II, para II) presented with pain abdomen and irregular menstrual cycles since the past 6 months. On evaluation, she was detected to uterine fibroids on ultrasonography. Hysterectomy was performed and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination. Gross examination revealed an enlarged uterus, with bosselated surface. On cut section, multiple intramural fibroids with whorled areas and arrears of hemorrhage were identified. The endocervix showed a small blue-black area measuring 0.5×0.5 cm (Fig. 1). On microscopic examination, loose clusters of pigment laden cells were observed in the sub-epithelial stroma of the endocervix. The cells had round to oval nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli with no atypical features (Fig. 2, 3). The cytoplasm was filled with multiple small brownish granules. These cells stained positive with Masson Fontana (Fig. 4), negative with Perl’s Prussian blue and when bleached with hydrogen peroxide. The overlying epithelium showed neither melanocytes nor melanin pigment accumulation. Sections from the fibroid showed interlacing bundles of smooth muscle fibers with vesicular nucleus. No mitotic figures, atypical features or necrosis were noted. Based on the following observations a diagnosis of leiomyoma with blue nevus of the endocervix was rendered.

Cut  section  of  the  uterus  shows endocervix  showed  a  small  blue-black  area  (marked  with  arrows)

Fig. 1: Cut  section  of  the  uterus  shows endocervix  showed  a  small  blue-black  area  (marked  with  arrows)

Clusters  of  melanin  pigment  laden  cells  arranged  in  clusters  overlying  the  endocervical epithelium. (H& E ×40)

Fig. 2:  Clusters  of  melanin  pigment  laden  cells  arranged  in  clusters  overlying  the  endocervical epithelium. (H& E ×40)

Similar  cell   clusters  surrounding  the  endocervical  glands.  (H &E ×40)

Fig. 3: Similar  cell   clusters  surrounding  the  endocervical  glands.  (H &E ×40)

Cells show positivity for melanin. (Masson Fontana, ×40)

Fig. 4:  Cells show positivity for melanin. (Masson Fontana, ×40)

 

Discussion

Melanocytic lesions are uncommon lesions of the cervix because the cervical mucosa is devoid of melanocytes (1, 2).The various pigmented lesions other than blue nevus include malignant melanoma and melanosis of the cervix, which can be included in the differential diagnosis of a cervical blue nevus. When compared to the blue nevus, melanosis of the cervix shows the presence of melanin pigment in the basal epithelium only, and not in the stroma. However, melanoma is characterized by junctional activity and clusters of malignant cells invading the stromawith atypical nuclear features (4, 10). In the present case, melanin pigment was not observed in the basal epithelium.

There are various theories as postulated by Craddock et al and Sun et al. regarding the origin of pigmented melanocytes in the cervix. These include 1. Migration of neural crest elements during embryonic life; 2. Melanocytes could migrate from adjacent mucocutaneous areas; 3. Squamous metaplasia or epidermidisation of the cervical epithelium due to prolapse or chronic irritation (2, 11, 12).

A lot of controversy regarding the origin of cells in a blue cell nevus exists. Sun et al. (12) have regarded that blue nevus cells are not of purely melanocytic or Schwannian origin, but are derived from a precursor cell that has some common features of both melanocyte and Schwann cell. Saikia et al. also describe these cells to show both melanocytic and schwannian differentiation (13).

Various authors have described these lesions to present as

Table 1: Differential diagnosis of blue nevi in the cervix

Differential Diagnosis

Features on Histopathology

 

Blue Nevi

Clusters singly scattered, spindle to elongated cells with melanin pigment seen in the subepithelial stroma.

Neither melanocytes nor melanin pigment accumulation in the overlying epithelium.

 

Melanosis of Cervix

Hyperkeratosis, acanthosis of overlying epithelium with abundant basilar pigmentation.

Melanin pigment is present in the basal epithelium only.

No stromal melanocytes are seen. No atypical features

 

Melanoma of Cervix

Presence of melanin pigment in the normal cervical epithelium

Junctional activity is seen with infiltrating clusters of malignant cells

Stromal invasion and atypical nuclear features are seen

Cells display variable degree of pleomorphism, show prominent eosinophilic nucleoli and melanin pigment.

 

Blue nevi have also been found in association with malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix, endometrioid adenocarcinoma and vulvar malignant melanoma (14-16). However the exact clinical significance of these associations is not known.

All pigmented lesions of the cervix should be carefully followed up if detected on endocervical curettage, cervical biopsy, or cervical cone biopsy specimens. Detecting these lesions on hysterectomy specimens could be challenging. It requires meticulous examination as they can be easily unnoticed on gross examination owing to their minute size. The diagnosis should be made carefully taking into consideration all the differential diagnosis.

Acknowledgement

We wish to thank all the technical staff of the Department of Pathology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

How to cite this article:
Talengala Bhat S, Shivamurthy A, Calicut Kini Rao A. Incidentally Detected Blue Nevus of Endocervix: a Case Report. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10(3):248-52.

  1. Szumiło J, Patel A, Patel S, Burdan F. Blue nevus of the endocervix. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2010;69(1):62-64.
  2. Craddock KJ1, Bandarchi B, Khalifa MA. Blue nevi of the Müllerian tract: case series and review of the literature. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11(4):284-9
  3. Zevallos-Giampietri EA, Barrionuevo C. Common blue nevus of the uterine cervix: case report and review. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2004; 12(1):79–82.
  4. Fernandez-Flores A. Blue nevi of internal organs are more similar to the so-called dermal melanocytosis than to cutaneous blue nevi. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2007;48(1):5-10.
  5. Bland-Sutton. J. Tumors: innocent and malignant. London: Cassell 1922;122-3.
  6. Deb P, Swarup D, Bhopte AG. Blue nevus of the uterine cervix. MJAFI 2000;56:342-343
  7. Uehara T, Izumo T, Kishi K, Takayama S, Kasuga T. Stromal melanocytic foci (‘blue nevus’) in step sections of the uterine cervix. Acta Pathol Jpn 1991;41(10):751–756.
  8. Patel DS, Bhagavan BS. Blue nevus of the uterine cervix. Hum Pathol 1985; 16(1):79–86.
  9. Donofrio V1, Terracciano LM, Boscaino A, De Rosa G, Buffa D. Blue nevus of the uterine cervix. Pathologica 1992;84(1092):539-45
  10. Handa U, Mohan H, Garg S. Incidental detection of pigmented lesions in the cervix. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47: 254–255.
  11. Alper M, Aydin A, Ozdemir I, Suna M, Ciralik H, Aksoy KA. Blue nevus with an unusual presentation: two patients with endocervical location. Ceska Gynekol 2004;69(5):411-3
  12. Sun J, Morton TH Jr, Gown AM. Antibody HMB-45 identifies the cells of blue nevi. An immunohistochemical study on paraffin sections. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14(8):748-51.
  13. Saikia UN, Dey P, Saikia B, Gupta I. Melanin containing cells of the uterine cervix and a possible histogenesis: A case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2004;47(1):22–23
  14. Parada D, Peña KB, Riu F. Coexisting Malignant Melanoma and Blue Nevus of the Uterine Cervix: An Unusual Combination.  Case Rep Pathol 2012; 2012: 986542.
  15. Ishida M1, Kagotani A, Yoshida K, Iwai M, Okabe H. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma concurrent with a blue nevus of the endometrium and uterine cervix: A case report. Oncol Lett 2013;6(5):1219-1221.
  16. Hagiwara T, Kaku T, Kobayashi H, Hirakawa T, Nakano H. Coexisting vulvar malignant melanoma and blue nevus of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99(2):519-20.