Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Pathology, Mashhad Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Students Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background & Objective: Urine cytology is an important diagnostic method for urinary tract cancers (especially carcinomas), which is suitable for follow-up of residual urothelial tumors after surgery of malignant bladder tumors. In this study, for the first time, liquid-based cytology (LBC) was used in cervical cytology. Compared to direct smear cytology (DSC), LBC reduced background elements (including cellular debris, inflammatory cells, and blood cells), provided better cell preservation, and had a higher satisfaction rate. In this study, we performed two different methods (DSC and LBC) to detect bladder lesions; also, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of these methods.
Methods:  A total of 146 samples were taken from patients with suspected bladder cancer and processed for direct smear and LBC. In both methods, findings were reported according to the Paris System. Then, patients underwent cystoscopy and biopsy. Next, the accuracy of cytology methods was evaluated according to biopsy reports. The sensitivity and specificity of these methods were also calculated.
Results: Credit indices obtained for the direct smear method included sensitivity (62.5%), specificity (89%), positive predictive value (89.5%), and negative predictive value (91.5%). For LBC methods, credit indices included sensitivity (85.7%), specificity (99%), positive predictive value (96%), and negative predictive value (96%). Agreement between the two methods was statistically significant (P<0.000) in negative biopsies but not in positive biopsies (P>0.05).
Conclusion: This study showed that LBC has higher sensitivity and specificity than the direct smear.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Eble JN SG, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn I. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 3 ed. lyon: IARC Press; 2005.
  2. Inamura K. Bladder Cancer: New Insights into Its Molecular Pathology. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(4). [DOI:10.3390/cancers10040100] [PMID] [PMCID]
  3. Pasin E, Josephson DY, Mitra AP, Cote RJ, Stein JP. Superficial bladder cancer: an update on etiology, molecular development, classification, and natural history. Rev Urol. 2008;10(1):31-43.
  4. Zieger K, Wolf H, Olsen PR, Hojgaard K. Long-term follow-up of noninvasive bladder tumours (stage Ta): recurrence and progression. BJU Int. 2000;85(7):824-8. [DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00547.x] [PMID]
  5. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ, Frable W, Corder MP, Hafermann MD, et al. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J Urol. 1983;130(6):1083-6. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)51695-X]
  6. Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Verbeek AL, Heijbroek RP, Debruyne FM. The clinical epidemiology of superficial bladder cancer. Dutch South-East Cooperative Urological Group. Br J Cancer. 1993;67(4):806-12. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1038/bjc.1993.147]
  7. Han RF, Pan JG. Can intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin reduce recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Urology. 2006;67(6):1216-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.014] [PMID]
  8. Anastasiadis A, de Reijke TM. Best practice in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Ther Adv Urol. 2012;4(1):13-32. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1177/1756287211431976]
  9. Zhu CZ, Ting HN, Ng KH, Ong TA. A review on the accuracy of bladder cancer detection methods. J Cancer. 2019;10(17):4038-44. [DOI:10.7150/jca.28989] [PMID] [PMCID]
  10. Wiener HG, Mian C, Haitel A, Pycha A, Schatzl G, Marberger M. Can urine bound diagnostic tests replace cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer? J Urol. 1998;159(6):1876-80. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63184-7]
  11. Stamatiou K, Papadoliopoulos I, Dahanis S, Zafiropoulos G, Polizois K. The accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of superficial bladder tumors in patients presenting with hematuria. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(2):134-7. [DOI:10.4103/0256-4947.51802] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Ozen H, Hall MC. Bladder cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000;12(3):255-9. [PMID] [DOI:10.1097/00001622-200005000-00012]
  13. Truta A, Popon TA, Saraci G, Ghervan L, Pop IV. Novel non invasive diagnostic strategies in bladder cancer. Clujul Med. 2016;89(2):187-92. [DOI:10.15386/cjmed-534] [PMID] [PMCID]
  14. Hoda RS. Non-gynecologic cytology on liquid-based preparations: A morphologic review of facts and artifacts. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35(10):621-34. [DOI:10.1002/dc.20698] [PMID]
  15. Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, Caspers HP, Jakse G, Boecking A. The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(3):304-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2004.12.008] [PMID]
  16. Linder J. Recent advances in thin-layer cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;18(1):24-32.   [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199801)18:13.0.CO;2-U]
  17. Lu DY, Nassar A, Siddiqui MT. High-grade urothelial carcinoma: comparison of SurePath liquid-based processing with cytospin processing. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37(1):16-20. [DOI:10.1002/dc.20957] [PMID]
  18. V L. New techniques In: Kocjan WGG, editor. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 1. 3rd ed. london: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 891-902.
  19. Denton KJ. Liquid based cytology in cervical cancer screening. Bmj. 2007;335(7609):1-2. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.39262.506528.47] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Fakhrjou a, madaen sk. Specificity and sensitivity of urine cytology for screening patients with urothelial tumors and hematuria. Medical journal of tabriz university of medical sciences. 2003;37(57):-.
  21. Kord S, Mokhtari M, Tahmasebi S. Comparison of Liquid-based and Conventional Cytology in Diagnosis of Breast Mass. J Cytol. 2019;36(1):22-7. [DOI:10.4103/JOC.JOC_139_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Deshou H, Changhua W, Qinyan L, Wei L, Wen F. Clinical utility of Liqui-PREP™ cytology system for primary cervical cancer screening in a large urban hospital setting in China. J Cytol. 2009;26(1):20-5. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9371.54863] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. Son SM, Koo JH, Choi SY, Lee HC, Lee YM, Song HG, et al. Evaluation of Urine Cytology in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients: A Comparison of CellprepPlus® Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smear. Korean J Pathol. 2012;46(1):68-74. [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2012.46.1.68]
  24. Koo JH, Lee HC, Song HG, Han HS, Lee KH, Choe KH, et al. Comparison of Cytologic Evaluation between Conventional Method and CellprepPlus(R) Liquid-Based Cytology in Body Fluid. J Pathol Transl Med. 2009;43(5):448-52. [DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2009.43.5.448]
  25. Gibb RK, Martens MG. The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(Suppl 1):S2-s11.
  26. Karnon J, Peters J, Platt J, Chilcott J, McGoogan E, Brewer N. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(20):iii, 1-78. [DOI:10.3310/hta8200] [PMID]
  27. Lee S, Park JH, Do SI, Kim YW, Lee J, Chang SG, et al. Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in 236 cases; a Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparation and Conventional Cytospin Method. J Pathol Transl Med. 2007;18(2):119-25.
  28. Koh JS, Cho SY, Ha HJ, Kim JS, Shin MS. Cytologic Evaluation of CellPrep(R) Liquid-based Cytology in Cervicovaginal, Body Fluid, and Urine Specimens: Comparison with ThinPrep(R). J Pathol Transl Med. 2007;18(1):29-35.
  29. Yim H, Joo HJ, Kim YB, Hong SW. Comparison of Conventional Smear, Cell Block and Liquid-based Preparation in the Evaluation of Bronchial Washing Specimen in Lung Cancer Patients. J Pathol Transl Med. 2011;45(3):296-302. [DOI:10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2011.45.3.296]
  30. Piaton E, Faÿnel J, Hutin K, Ranchin MC, Cottier M. Conventional liquid-based techniques versus Cytyc Thinprep processing of urinary samples: a qualitative approach. BMC Clin Pathol. 2005;5:9. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6890-5-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
  31. Kapoor K, Datta C, Pal DK. Is liquid-based cytology an alternative to conventional cytology for detection of malignant cells in urine of bladder cancer? Eastern Indian prospective observational study. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(5):351-6. [DOI:10.5152/tud.2019.19040] [PMID] [PMCID].