Document Type : Original Research


1 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JN Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India

2 Dept. of Pathology, JN Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, , India

3 Dept. of Pathology,Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, India


Background: The term dysfunctional uterine bleeding(DUB) refers to any abnormal bleeding from the uterus, unassociated with tumour, inflammation and pregnancy. The histological diagnosis of DUB is very essential for adequate management especially in perimenopausal and postmenopausal females. The present study was undertaken with the aim of evaluating DUB in various age groups, carry out histopathological study of the endometrium and analyze its clinic-pathological patterns. Methods: The study included 500 cases of atypical uterine bleeding, out of which 120 cases of DUB were included based on clinical features and detailed investigations. Study was conducted in Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, between March 2003 to December 2004  Endometrial tissue was collected by D&C procedure and the samples were sent for histopathological evaluation by pathologist. Result: Hyperplasia was the commonest endometrial pathology (20.5%) followed by luteal phase insufficiency (15.6%) and secretory endometrium (13.7%). Endometritis including tubercular endometritis (12.7%), post abortal (5.8%), proliferative (6.8%), polyp (3.9%), atrophic (3.9%), exogenous hormone changes (2.9%) and anovulatory cycles(6.8%) made up for the remaining lesions. Conclusion: DUB occurs secondary to a wide variety of functional and structural abnormalities, warranting a thorough evaluation especially in perimenoupausal females. Menorrhagia is a common symptom and the most likely etiology relates to the patient’s age. Significant number of endometrial samples revealed pathology rendering endometrial curetting and biopsy an important procedure. Cervical cytology is a valuable adjunct however histopathology remains the gold standard in diagnosis.


  1. Edlund M, Magnusson C, Von Schoultz B et al. Quality of life, a Swedish survey of 2200 women with DUB. London Royal Society of Medicine Press.1994;36-7.
  2. Livingstone M, Fraser IS. Mechanism of abnormal uterine bleeding. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:60-7.
  3. Sutherland AM. Functional uterine haemorrhage: a critical review of the literature since 1938. Glasgow Med J 1949;30:1-28.
  4. Kistner R. Gynecology, principles and practice. Chicago, ii.Year book 1964:238.
  5. Coulter A, Bradlow J, Agass M.Outcomes of referral to gynaecology outpatient clinics for menstrual problems:an audit of general practice records. Br J Obst Gynecol 2003;110:938-47.
  6. Khan S, Hammed S, Umber A. Histopathological pattern of endometrium on diagnostic D&C in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Annals KEMU 2011; 2:166-70.
  7. Saraswathi D,Thanka J,Shalinee R, Aarthi R, Jaya V, Kumar PV. Study of endometrial pathology in abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol India 2011;61:424-30.
  8. Albers JR, Hull Sk, Wesley RM. Abnormal uterine bleeding. Am Fam Phys 2004; 69:1915-26.
  9. Dhlenbach-Hellweg G. Histopathology of endometeium. 4th ed New York: Springer-Verlag;1993.
  10. March CM. Bleeding treatment and problems. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41:928-39.
  11. Gleeson NC, Buggy F, Shepard BL, Bonnar J: Effect of tranaxaemic acid on measured menstrual loss&endometrial fibrinolytic enzymes in DUB. Acta Obstet Gynaecol. Scand 1994,73:274-7.
  12. Bourdez P, Bongers MY, Mol BW. Treatment of DUB: Patient preference for endometrial ablation, a levonorgertrel releasing intrauterine system or hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2004;82:160-6.
  13. Towbin NA,Gviazda IM, March CM. Office hysteroscopy versus transvaginal ultrasonogtaphy in the evaluation of patients with excessive uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 174:1678-82.
  14. Muzzafar M, Akhtar KAK, Yasmin S ,Rehman M, Iqbal W, Khan MA. Menstrual Irregularities with excessive blood loss: a clinico-pathological correlation. J Pak Med Assoc 2005;55:486-9.
  15. Moghal N. Diagnostic value of endometrial curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding- a histopathological study. J Pak Med Assoc 1997;47:295-9.
  16. Haynes PJ, Hodgson H, Anderson ABM, Turnbull AC. Measurement of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia. BJOG 1977;84:763-8.
  17. Preston JT, Cameron IT, Adams EJ, Smith SK. Comparitive study of tranaxaemic acid & norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia. Br J Obst Gynae 1995;102:401-6.
  18. Baral R, Pudasini S. Histopathological pattern of endometrial samples in abnormal uterine bleeding. J Path Nepal 2011;1:13-16.
  19. Silander T. Hysteroscopy through a transparent rubber balloon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962;114:125.
  20. Abdullah LS, Bondagji NS. Histopathological pattern of endometrial sampling performed for abnormal uterine bleeding. Bahrain Med Bull; 33 (4): 1-6.
  21. Dexous S, Labastida R, Arias A. Hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding. In :Segler AM, Linde Hysteroscopy: Principles and practice. Philedalphia, JB Lipponcott, 1984:121-134.
  22. Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garacia R, Allison K et. al. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia. Am J Obstet gynecol 2009; 200: 678.e1-678e6.
  23. Patil SG, Bhute SB, Inamdar SA,Acharya SN, Srivastava DS. J Gynec Endosc Surg 2009;1:98-104.
  24. Fakhar S, Saeed G, Khan AH, Alam YA. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ann Saudi Med 2008; 28:188-91.
  25. Yusuf NW, Nadeem R, Yusuf AW, Rahman R. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding.A retrospective clinicopathological study over 2 years. Pak J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;9:27-30.