Document Type : Original Research


1 Infertility & Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Pathology, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran


Background and Objective: Infertility refers to the failure in achieving pregnancy of a couple after one year of regular sexual intercourse without using a protection method. The purpose of this research work was to evaluate the current status of the test and quality control performance in semen analysis in selected laboratories.
Material and Methods: The semen analysis was performed in the Laboratory of Andrology in terms of macroscopic examination which include volume, color, viscosity, pH and acidity, and in terms of microscopy: the rate of sperm movement, the exact number of sperms per ml of semen, the percentage of sperm viability and movement, the presence of germ cells and white blood cells. Several questions for each part of the test were selected and answered by the director of the laboratories or andrology section supervisor.
 Results: There was a wide range in the performance of selected medical laboratories in Tehran regarding the standards of semen analysis according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Laboratory Manual for the examination and processing of human semen, fifth edition in 2010. They followed the instructions related to the sample collection in about 70% of the evaluated parameters, initial macroscopic examination in about 87% of the selected subjects, and the microscopic evaluation of sperm in about 65% of the test parameters.
Conclusion: some laboratories do not follow the instructions of the WHO in performing semen analysis, and most of them do not follow the suggested methods in all parts of the test.


Main Subjects

  1. Patel AS, Leong JY, Ramasamy R. Prediction of male infertility by the World Health Organization laboratory manual for assessment of semen analysis: A systematic review. Arab journal of urology. 2017 ;16(1):96-102.
    PMid:29713540 PMCid:PMC5922004
  2. Irani M, Chow S, Keating D, Elder S, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo G. Optimizing the first-line fertility treatment. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2018:1-5.
  3. Morin SJ, Scott RT. Knowledge gaps in male infertility: a reproductive endocrinology and infertility perspective. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(Suppl 3):S283-S91.
  4. Ford W. Comments on the release of the 5th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Asian journal of andrology. 2010;12(1):59.
  5. Cao X-W, Lin K, Li C-Y, Yuan C-W. A review of WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Zhonghua nan ke xue= National journal of andrology. 2011;17(12):1059-63.
  6. Cooper TG, Noonan E, Von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker H, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human reproduction update. 2010;16(3):231-45.
  7. Tocci A, Lucchini C. WHO reference values for human semen. Human reproduction update. 2010;16(5):559.
  8. Sikka SC, Ayaz A. Standardized Semen Analysis and Quality Control Management for Multicenter Male Reproductive Toxicology Clinical Trials. InBioenvironmental Issues Affecting Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health. 2018 Jan 1 (pp. 371-386). Academic Press.
  9. Jensen CFS, Khan O, Sønksen J, Fode M, Dupree JM, Shah T, et al. Comparison of semen quality between university-based and private assisted reproductive technology laboratories. Scandinavian journal of urology. 2018;52(1):65-9.
  10. Nieschlag E, Pock T, Hellenkemper B. External Quality Control of Semen Analysis Reveals Low Compliance with WHO Guidelines. Journal für Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie-Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology. 2018;14(6):306-10.
  11. Punjabi U, Wyns C, Mahmoud A, Vernelen K, China B, Verheyen G. Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis. Andrology. 2016;4(6):1084-93.
  12. Sikka SC, Hellstrom WJ. Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure. Asian journal of andrology. 2016;18(3):392.
  13. Esteves SC, Chan P. A systematic review of recent clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the evaluation of the infertile male. International urology and nephrology. 2015;47(9):1441-56.
  14. Esteves SC. Controversies Surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization Cutoff Values for Human Semen Characteristics and Its Impact on Unexplained Infertility. InUnexplained Infertility 2015 (pp. 13-20). Springer, New York, NY.
  15. Filimberti E, Degl'Innocenti S, Borsotti M, Quercioli M, Piomboni P, Natali I, et al. High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme. Andrology. 2013;1(3):401-7.
  16. Keel BA, Stembridge TW, Pineda G, Serafy Sr NT. Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States. Fertility and sterility. 2002;78(3):603-8.
  17. Riddell D, Pacey A, Whittington K. Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Human reproduction. 2005;20(12):3441-5.
  18. Mallidis C, Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Lablans M, Ückert F, Nieschlag E. Ten years' experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis. Fertility and sterility. 2012;98(3):611-6. e4.