Seyedeh Mehrnaz Kouhbanani nejad; Farzaneh Armin; Shahriar dabiri; Ali Derakhshani; Maryam Iranpour; Alireza Farsinejad
Volume 13, Issue 4 , October 2018, , Pages 454-460
Abstract
Background and Objective: In recent years, due to increasing number of patients with non-healing skin ulcers, skin substitutes have been used. Skin substitutes contain living cells causing faster and more effective wound healing. Therefore, research on the use of autologous and allogeneic cells such ...
Read More
Background and Objective: In recent years, due to increasing number of patients with non-healing skin ulcers, skin substitutes have been used. Skin substitutes contain living cells causing faster and more effective wound healing. Therefore, research on the use of autologous and allogeneic cells such as fibroblasts in skin substitutes has attracted attentions. However, there are discrepancies in the immune responses to allogeneic fibroblasts. Therefore, we aimed to review the immune responses to allogeneic fibroblasts.Methods: Donor fibroblasts were isolated from the skin of three rats. Nine recipient rats which were subcutaneously injected with three different regimens, were divided into three groups: Group 1; phosphate buffered saline (PBS) without cells (control), group 2: allogeneic fibroblasts of one animal source suspended in phosphate buffered saline, and group 3; phosphate buffered saline containing mixed allogeneic fibroblasts of three animal sources. The skin samples were biopsied at 1, 3 and 7 days after injection and studied histopathologically. Results and Conclusion: No signs of redness and edema were observed in the injection sites. In pathology examination, changes such as vasculitis, eosinophils and lymphocytes accumulation around fibroblasts, fibroblast apoptosis and transplant rejection at the injection site were not observed in either group.Subcutaneous injection of allogeneic fibroblasts in rats can be introduced as a promising approach for wound healing as they do not stimulate the immune system.
Mohammad Ali Rajabi; Fatemeh Rajabi; Parvin Rajabi Dehnavi; Mitra Heidarpour
Volume 3, Issue 1 , January 2008, , Pages 15-19
Abstract
Background and Objective: Angiogenesis is a complex program of several steps and it is tightly regulated by pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. Angiogenesis is one of the key elements in cutaneous wound healing and skin cancers. Estrogen seems to have positive modulating effect on cutaneous wound ...
Read More
Background and Objective: Angiogenesis is a complex program of several steps and it is tightly regulated by pro- and anti-angiogenic factors. Angiogenesis is one of the key elements in cutaneous wound healing and skin cancers. Estrogen seems to have positive modulating effect on cutaneous wound healing and this effect may be explained by its angiogenic properties. This study aims to investigate the effect of estrogen on cutaneous wound angiogenesis in rats through histological criteria. Materials and Methods: This was an experimental study which was carried out at Esfahan University of Medical Sciences in August 2007. Forty rats were randomly allocated into two groups and an experimental wound was induced in their skin. Wounds in the case group were treated with daily topical estrogen and gentamicin, while the controls received only topical gentamicin. After 14 days of treatment, biopsies were obtained. Results: Evaluation of wounds through a validated histological scoring system revealed significant difference between control and treated mice. The latter exhibited increased microvasculature and significantly higher scores of angiogenesis. Conclusion: Our study suggests that topical estrogen is able to increase cutaneous wound angiogenesis considering objective histological criteria.
