Breast Pathology
Primariadewi Rustamadji; Elvan Wiyarta; Ineke Anggreani
Abstract
Background & Objective: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for invasive breast cancer (IBC) therapy need biomarkers to track their progress. Because of the relationship between NFkB, Survivin, and Cyclin D1 with NC resistance, the different expression levels of each of these biomarkers ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for invasive breast cancer (IBC) therapy need biomarkers to track their progress. Because of the relationship between NFkB, Survivin, and Cyclin D1 with NC resistance, the different expression levels of each of these biomarkers can be different between pre- and post-NC in IBC. However, no research has examined the correlation between these biomarkers before and after the NC expression. This study aimed to determine the correlation among them.Methods: Biomarkers expression (low and high) was used to classify 30 samples. ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67 status, tumor grade, age, and NC response were assessed. The amounts of Survivin, Cyclin D1, and NFkB were evaluated using immunohistochemistry, and samples were classified based on the cut-off. Chi-square and linear regression were used to evaluate the data.Results: No significant association was found with the changes in the expression of Survivin, Cyclin D1, and NFkB, both before and after the NC. Significant moderate correlations were shown between before and after the NC Survivin expression (r = 0.513) and Cyclin D1 expression (r = 0.543). The correlation between expression of NFkB before and after the NC was not significant.Conclusion: The high potential of these proteins as prognostic indicators was demonstrated by the strong positive association between the expression of Survivin and Cyclin D1 before and after the NC. This upregulation of biomarkers indicates chemoresistance in developing IBC in the presence of NC.
Breast Pathology
Primariadewi Rustamadji; Elvan Wiyarta; Kristina Anna Bethania
Abstract
Background & Objective: Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) is the most common type of breast cancer, which mainly causes axillary lymph-node metastasis (ALNM). Building on our previous research, we wanted to explore the optimal combination of AKT2, CD44v6, and MT1-MMP for the ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) is the most common type of breast cancer, which mainly causes axillary lymph-node metastasis (ALNM). Building on our previous research, we wanted to explore the optimal combination of AKT2, CD44v6, and MT1-MMP for the ALNM prediction.Methods: The presence or absence of ALNM was used to separate 46 paraffin blocks containing IBC-NST primary tumors into two groups. Age, tumor grade, tumor size, receptor status (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, TOP2A), and test biomarker expression were evaluated. Biomarker expressions were assessed by IHC staining and categorized according to their respective cut-offs from our previous study, while other data were collected from archives. Data was gathered and analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and AUROC models.Results: The expression of CD44v6 (OR: 12.77, 95% CI: 2.18-87.12, P=0.005) was identified as the independent variable for ALNM. Meanwhile, AKT2 expression (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 0.36-22.41, P=0.237) and MT1-MMP expression (OR: 5.35, 95% CI: 0.83-34.54, P=0.078) did not demonstrate a statistically significant independent association in respect to ALNM. Combining AKT2 and MT1-MMP on CD44v6 increased overall accuracy by 4% compared to CD44v6 alone (AUROC 0.89 vs. 0.85).Conclusion: The combined usage of AKT2, CD44v6, and MT1-MMP revealed no significant change compared to CD44v6 alone. Due to cost and practicality, we propose using CD44v6 as a biomarker predictor of ALNM in IBC-NST.
