Document Type: Original Research

Authors

Molecular Pathology Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective: Tuberculosis is still a major health problem, involving about 1/3 of the world´s population. Diagnosis is difficult when we only use Ziehl-Neelson staining. Many cases may be missed. A more rapid and sensitive diagnostic method is necessary. PCR may be helpful. The aim of this study was to compare PCR, Zieh-Neelsen staining and histopathologic findings in diagnosis of tuberculosis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Methods: Paraffin blocks of the submitted specimens of the patients clinically suspicious for tuberculosis or containing granuloma were selected. Ziehl-Neelsen Staining & TB-PCR (IS6110 element) was carried out. The results of the tests were compared by using the McNemar test. Statistical significance was accepted when the P value was less than 0.05. Results: Forty five specimens were included in the study, 35 had granulomas (19 with caseous necrosis). Acid-fast bacilli were identified in 17 specimens (37.8%). TB-PCR was positive in 16specimens (84%) with caseating granulomatous, 11 specimens (68.8%) with non-caseating granulomas & 6 specimens (60%) without granulomas. (P value = 0.59). Conclusions: TB-PCR on paraffin–embedded tissue is a potentially useful approach for early, rapid and sensitive diagnosis of tuberculosis. It is especially useful when granuloma is seen in tissue section, while acid-fast stain is negative. If there was no facilities for PCR, histopathological diagnosis with clinical correlation are more reliable in comparison to AFB results.

Keywords

  1. Bahadori M, Azizi MH. Common challenges in laboratory diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Red Crescent Med J 2012;14(1):3-9.
  2. WHO.WHO report Global tuberculosis control- Surveillance, Planning and Financing. WHO Press, 2008: 22-3.
  3. WHO.WHO report Global tuberculosis control- Epidemiology, Strategy and Financing. WHO Press, 2009:10-6.
  4. Hemmati M, Seghatoleslam A, Rasti M, Ebadat S, Mosavari N, Habibagahi M, et al.Expression and purification of recombinant mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) antigens, ESAT-6, CFP-10 and ESAT-6/CFP-10 and their diagnosis potential for detection of TB patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011;13(8):556-63.
  5. Arora SK, Gupta V, Gupta A, Bambery P, Kapoor GS, Sehgal S. Diagnostic efficacy of polymerase chain reaction in granulomatous uveitis. Tuber Lung Dis 1999;79 (4):229-33.
  6. Jahansen IS, Thomsen VØ, Forsgren A, Hansen BF, and Lundgren B. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in formalin-embedded tissue specimens with necrotizing granulomatous inflammation by strand displacement amplification. J Mol Diagn 2004;6(3):231-6.
  7. Chakravorty S, Sen MK, Tyagi JS. Diagnosis of Extra pulmonary tuberculosis by smear, culture, and PCR using universal sample processing technology. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43(9):4357-62.
  8. Park DY, Kim JY, Choi KU, Lee JS, Lee CH, Sol MY, et al. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction with histopathologic eatures for diagnosis of tuberculosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histologic specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127(3):326-30.
  9. Osaki M, Adachi H, Gomyo Y, Yoshida H, Ito H. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens by duplex polymerase chain reaction: application to histopathologic diagnosis. Mod Pathol 1997;10(1):78-83.
  10. Kivihya-Ndugga L, Van Cleeff M, Juma E, Kimwomi J, Githui W, Oskam L, et al. Comparison of PCR with the routine procedure for diagnosis of tuberculosis in a population with high prevalence of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42(3):1012-5.
  11. Tarng DC, Su WJ, Huang TP. PCR diagnosis on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues with acid-fast stain and culture negative in chronic in chronic dialysis patients of cervico-mediastinal tubercles lymphadenitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13(6):1543-6.
  12. Negi SS, Khan SF, Gupta S, Pasha ST, Khare S, Lal S. Comparison of the conventional diagnostic modalities, bactec culture and polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosis of tuberclosis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23(1):29-33.
  13. Omidi AA,Ghenaat J,Ghazvini K,Ayatollahi H,tavassolian h,Jafarian AH, et al. Incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in formalin fixed-paraffin embedded granulomatous dermatoses with multiplex PCR comparing fluorescent microscopy and acid fast staining in eastern Iran. Internet J Microb 2007;4(1):216-22.
  14. Bancroft J D, Stevens A, Turner D R. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Churchill Livingston Inc, New York. Third edition 1990;112:294-296.
  15. Kumar R,Abbas A,Delancey A, Malone E. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier;2010.
  16. Varello K, Pezzolato M, Mascarino D, Ingravalle F, Caramelli M, Bozzetta E. Comparison of histologic techniques for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in the framework of eradication programs. J Vet Diagn Invest 2008;20(2):164-9.
  17. Salian NV, Rish JA, Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Bates JH. Polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in histologic specimens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(4):1150-5.
  18. Nopvichai C, Sanpavat A, Sawatdee R, Assanasen T, Wacharapluesadee S, Thorne P S, et al.PCR detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in necrotizing non-granulomatous lymphadenitis using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue: a study in Thai patients. J Clin Pathol 2009;62(9):812-5.