Document Type: Original Research

Authors

1 Department of Pathology, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Medical Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Supervisor of Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Laboratory Senior Technical Associate of Genetic Ward, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

8 Hematology Department, Allied medical school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background & Objective:  A simple approach to prevent close contact in healthcare settings during the COVID-19 outbreak is to train patients to collect their own nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and deliver them to medical laboratories to have them processed. The aim of our study was to compare lab technician- with patient- collected oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples for detection of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) using rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR).
Methods:  Fifty adult patients with flu-like symptoms and radiologic findings compatible with atypical pneumonia who were admitted to the infectious diseases ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran, with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 from February 28 to April 27 of 2020 were randomly selected and entered in our study. Two sets of naso- and oropharyngeal swabs were collected, one set by a lab technician and the other by the patients, and the COVID-19 rRT-PCR test was performed.
Results:  Of 50 selected cases, in seven patients all collected naso- and oropharyngeal swabs tested positive, and in 22 patients all samples tested negative for COVID-19 in rRT-PCR. Discrepancies between rRT-PCR results of lab technician- and patient-collected swabs were observed in 12 nasopharyngeal and 13 oropharyngeal specimens. Positive lab technician-collected and negative patient-collected samples were observed in 10 and 5 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. Negative lab technician-collected and positive patient-collected samples were observed in two and seven nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. The overall percentage of agreement among both nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs taken by a lab technician and patients was 76% with a kappa value of 0.49 (p =0.001).
Conclusion:  Based on our findings, lab technician-collected naso- and oropharyngeal swabs cannot be replaced by patient-collected ones with regard to COVID-19 rRT-PCR.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Buddhisha Udugama, Pranav Kadhireson, Hannah N. Kozlowski ,et al. Diagnosing COVID-19 :The disease and tools for detection. March 2020;10.1021/acsnano.oco2624 [DOI:10.1021/acsnano.0c02624] [PMID] [PMCID]
  2. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-3. [DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
  3. Barton LM, Duval EJ, Stroberg E, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay S. Covid-19 autopsies, oklahoma, usa. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2020 May 5;153(6):725-33. [DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa062] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;396:497-506. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5]
  5. Dhiman N, Miller RM, Finley JL, Sztajnkrycer MD, Nestler DM, Boggust AJ, Jenkins SM, Smith TF, Wilson JW, Cockerill III FR, Pritt BS. Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing. InMayo Clinic Proceedings 2012 Jun 1 (Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 548-554). Elsevier. [DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.011] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Shantanu Nundy, MD, Kavitak Patel, MD. Self-service Diagnosis of COVID-19-Ready for prime time? .March 2020;PA19462
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Corona Virus (COVID-2019), Last reviewed: March 20, 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/
  8. Lambert SB, Allen KM, Druce JD, Birch CJ, Mackay IM, Carlin JB, Carapetis JR, Sloots TP, Nissen MD, Nolan TM. Community epidemiology of human metapneumovirus, human coronavirus NL63, and other respiratory viruses in healthy preschool-aged children using parent-collected specimens. Pediatrics. 2007 Oct 1;120(4):e929-37. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2006-3703] [PMID]
  9. Lambert SB, Allen KM, Nolan TM. Parent-collected respiratory specimens-a novel method for respiratory virus and vaccine efficacy research. Vaccine. 2008 Mar 28;26(15):1826-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.055] [PMID] [PMCID]
  10. Esposito S, Molteni CG, Daleno C, et al. Collection by trained pediatricians or parents of mid-turbinate nasal flocked swabs for the detection of influenza viruses in childhood. Virol J. 2010;7:85 [DOI:10.1186/1743-422X-7-85] [PMID] [PMCID]
  11. Seaman CP, Tran LT, Cowling BJ, Sullivan SG. Self-collected compared with professional-collected swabbing in the diagnosis of influenza in symptomatic individuals: A meta-analysis and assessment of validity. J Clin Virol. 2019 Sep 1;118:28-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2019.07.010] [PMID]
  12. Jackson ML, Nguyen M, Kirlin B, Madziwa L. Self-collected nasal swabs for respiratory virus surveillance. InOpen forum infectious diseases 2015 Dec 1 (Vol. 2, No. 4). Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofv152] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, Tan W. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. Jama. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-4. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.3786]
  14. Chunqin Longb, Huaxiang Xuc, Qinglin Shend , Xianghai Zhangb , Bing Fana, Chuanhong Wang. Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Europ J Radiol. 126 (2020) 108961 [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961] [PMID] [PMCID]
  15. Udugama B, Kadhiresan P, Kozlowski HN, Malekjahani A, Osborne M, Li VY, Chen H, Mubareka S, Gubbay JB, Chan WC. Diagnosing COVID-19: the disease and tools for detection. ACS nano. 2020 Mar 30;14(4):3822-35. [DOI:10.1021/acsnano.0c02624] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. The important role of serology for COVID-19 control. Lancet Infect Dis 2020, Published online April 20, 2020 [DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30322-4]
  17. Serology testing for COVID-19. Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, centerforhealthsecurity.org, 02/28/2020
  18. Gilsenan-Reed C, Higgins G, Langlois N. Determining a sampling regime for PCR detection of respiratory tract viral infection at coronial post-mortem examinations. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2020 Jun 23. [DOI:10.1007/s12024-020-00273-w] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Rahmani AR, Leili M, Azarian G, Poormohammadi A. Sampling and detection of corona viruses in air: A mini review. Sci Total Environ 2020 Jun 15;740:140207. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140207] [PMID] [PMCID]
  20. Waghmare A, Krantz EM, Baral S, Vasquez E, Loeffelholz T, Chung EL, et al. Reliability of self-sampling for accurate assessment of respiratory virus viral and immunologic kinetics. medRxiv 2020 Apr 6. [DOI:10.1101/2020.04.03.20051706]
  21. .Mohammadi A, Esmaeilzadeh E, Li Y, Bosch RJ, Li J. SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Different Respiratory Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv 2020 May 19. [DOI:10.1101/2020.05.14.20102038]
  22. Minich JJ, Ali F, Marotz C, Belda-Ferre P, Shaffer JP, Carpenter CS,et al. Feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 virus detection from consumer-grade cotton swabs. medRxiv 2020 May 18. [DOI:10.1101/2020.05.12.20073577]
  23. Piras A, Rizzo D, Longoni E, Turra N, Urru S, Saba PP,et al. Nasopharyngeal swab collection in the suspicion of Covid-19. Am J Otolaryngol 2020 May 27:102551. [DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102551] [PMID] [PMCID]
  24. Mavian C, Pond SK, Marini S, Magalis BR, Vandamme AM, Dellicour S, et al. Sampling bias and incorrect rooting make phylogenetic network tracing of SARS-COV-2 infections unreliable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020 Jun 9;117(23):12522-12523. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.2007295117] [PMID] [PMCID]
  25. Petruzzi G, De Virgilio A, Pichi B, Mazzola F, Zocchi J, Mercante G, et al. COVID-19: Nasal and oropharyngeal swab. Head Neck 2020 Jun;42(6):1303-1304. [DOI:10.1002/hed.26212] [PMID] [PMCID]
  26. Mawaddah A, Gendeh HS, Lum SG, Marina MB. Upper respiratory tract sampling in COVID-19. Malays J Pathol 2020 Apr;42(1):23-35.
  27. Song F, Zhang X, Zha Y, Liu W. COVID-19: Recommended sampling sites at different stages of the disease. J Med Virol 2020 Apr 16. [DOI:10.1002/jmv.25892] [PMID] [PMCID]
  28. Péré H, Podglajen I, Wack M, Flamarion E, Mirault T, Goudot G,et al. Nasal Swab Sampling for SARS-CoV-2: a Convenient Alternative in Times of Nasopharyngeal Swab Shortage. J Clin Microbiol 2020 May 26;58(6). [DOI:10.1128/JCM.00721-20] [PMID] [PMCID]
  29. Ye G, Li Y, Lu M, Chen S, Luo Y, Wang S, et al. Experience of different upper respiratory tract sampling strategies for detection of COVID-19. J Hosp Infect 2020 May;105(1):1-2. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.012] [PMID] [PMCID]