Document Type: Original Research

Authors

Department of Pathology, N.K.P Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Background & Objective: Modified Ultra-fast Papanicolaou (MUFP) stain has been developed from Papanicolaou stain (PAP) with the goal to improve staining quality, minimize staining time for obtaining immediate cytological diagnosis and to check specimen adequacy during Ultrasound guided Fine needle Aspiration Cytology (US guided FNAC). The aim of this research was to study the cytomorphological features of intra-abdominal lesions with help of US guided FNAC and to assess the diagnostic utility of Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou stain in cytological diagnosis.
Methods: This cross sectional study enrolled consecutive 100 subjects in N.K.P Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Nagpur, which is a tertiary teaching hospital in India, from July 2015 to June 2017 who underwent US guided FNAC for Intra-abdominal lesions. Fine needle aspiration was done under ultrasound guidance and the smears were divided into two groups. Wet smears were fixed in 95% ethyl alcohol for conventional PAP staining and air dried for MUFP. After staining, results were evaluated on basis of the cytological features. Scores were given according to four parameters namely background of smears, staining pattern, cell morphology and nuclear staining. Quality index was calculated from the ratio of score achieved to the possible maximum score.
Results: The most common organs involved were ovaries (46 %) followed by liver (11%) and most common lesions were malignant (68 %). The cytological characteristic showed significant difference in all four parameters (P<0.05) when MUFP stain smears were compared with PAP stain smears. There was also statistically significant difference when cumulative score and Quality Index were compared (P<0.001) between the two stains.
Conclusion: The US guided Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is simple, safe, rapid and inexpensive technique useful in cytological diagnosis. MUFP stain is fast, reliable and has better diagnostic utility for cytological diagnosis when compared to PAP stain.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Islam T, Hossain F, Rumpa AP, Sikder NH, Bhuiyan MA, Karim E, Hossain A. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology: a sensitive diagnostic tool for diagnosis of intra-abdominal lesions. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin. 2013 Jul 23;39(1):14-7. [DOI:10.3329/bmrcb.v39i1.15792] [PMID]
  2. Sheikh M, Sawhney S, Dey P, al-Saeed O, Behbehani A. Deep-seated thoracic and abdominal masses: usefulness of ultrasound and computed tomography guidance in fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. Australas Radiol. 2000 May;44(2):155-60. [DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00799.x] [PMID]
  3. Ansari NA, Derias NW. Fine needle aspiration cytology. J Clin Pathol. 1997 Jul;50(7):541-3. [DOI:10.1136/jcp.50.7.541] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. Diamantis A, Magiorkinis E, Koutselini H. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: historical aspects. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2009;47(2):191-7. [DOI:10.2478/v10042-009-0027-x] [PMID]
  5. Dodd LC, Mooney EE, Layfield LJ, Nelson RC. Fine Needle Aspiration of the Liver and Pancreas: A Cytology Primer for Radiologists. Radiology 1997 Apr; 203 (1):1 -9. [DOI:10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122373] [PMID]
  6. Dey P, Radhika S, Rajwanshi A, Kochhar S. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of pancreas. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1994 Jul;37(3):269-74. PubMed PMID: 7814057.
  7. Reddy VB, Gattuso P, Abraham KP, Moncada R, Castelli MJ. Computed tomography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of deep-seated lesions. A four-year experience. Acta cytologica. 1991;35(6):753-6.
  8. Fisher AJ, Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Simmons CM, Nelson RC. Small lymph nodes of the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum: Usefulness of sonographically guided biopsy. Radiology 1997; 205: 185-90. [DOI:10.1148/radiology.205.1.9314983] [PMID]
  9. Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a review. Hum Pathol. 1983 Jan;14(1):9-28. Review. [DOI:10.1016/S0046-8177(83)80042-2]
  10. Frable WJ. Needle aspiration biopsy: past, present, and future. Hum Pathol. 1989 Jun;20(6):504-17. Review [DOI:10.1016/0046-8177(89)90242-6]
  11. Choudhary P, Sudhamani S, Pandit A, Kiri V. Comparison of modified ultrafast Papanicolaou stain with the standard rapid Papanicolaou stain in cytology of various organs. J Cytol. 2012 Oct;29(4):241-5. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9371.103942] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Thakur M, Guttikonda VR. Modified ultrafast Papanicolaou staining technique: A comparative study. J Cytol. 2017 Jul-Sep;34(3):149-153. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_23_16. [DOI:10.4103/JOC.JOC_23_16] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Kamal MM, Kulkarni MM, Wahane RN. Ultrafast Papanicolaou stain modified for developing countries: efficacy and pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(2):205-12. [DOI:10.1159/000320909] [PMID]
  14. Reddy S, Andola SK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of intraabdominal lesions. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011 June, 5(3): 551-8
  15. Nóbrega J, dos Santos G. Aspirative cytology with fine-needle in the abdomen, retroperitoneum and pelvic cavity: a seven year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Center of Porto. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1994 Feb;20(1):37-42.
  16. Ghodasara V, Goswami H, Hemina Desai H, Patel S, Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) Study of Intra-abdominal Mass Lesions, BJKines-NJBAS 2015 December; 7(2):32-7
  17. A L H, Sindhuram V S, S S, J K S, I V, Aditya A. Ultrasound guided fnac of abdominal-pelvic masses-the pathologists' perspective. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Feb;7(2):273-7.
  18. Reyaz TA, Summyia F, Isma N, Nazia B, Adil S, Sameena K et al. USG guided fine needle aspiration cytology of intra-abdominal and pelvic masses in Kashmir: A study at tertiary care hospital. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016, 5(4):169-175
  19. Namshiker AAN, Rocha PD, Pinto RGW. Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Assessment of Intra-Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Lesions-A Comparative Study. National J Lab Med. 2016 Jul, 5(3): 31-37
  20. Bandyopadhyay A, Chakraborty J, Chowdhury AR, Bhattacharya A, Bhattachrya P, Chowdhury M. Fine needle aspiration cytology of ovarian tumors with histological correlation. Journal of Cytology. 2012; 29(1):35-40 [DOI:10.4103/0970-9371.93218] [PMID] [PMCID]
  21. Pal S, Chakrabartia S, Deuoghuriab D, Phukana J, Sinhaa A, Mondal P, Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Ovarian Masses with Histopathological Correlation Acta Cytologica 2015;59:149-155 [DOI:10.1159/000380937] [PMID]
  22. Sato M, Taniguchi E, Kagiya T, Nunobiki O, Yang Q, Nakamura M, et al. A modified rapid Papanicolaou stain for imprint smears. Acta Cytol 2004;48:461-2
  23. Yang GC, Alvarez II. Ultrafast modified Papanicolaou stain: an alternative preparation for fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):55-60. PubMed PMID: 7531380.
  24. Kamal MM, Bodele A, Munshi MM, Bobhate SK, Kher AV. Efficacy of a modified Ultra Fast Papanicolaou (UFP) stain for breast aspirates. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2000 Oct;43(4):417-21.
  25. Alwahaibi N, Alsubhi M, Aldairi N, Alshukaili A, Bai U. Comparison of ultrafast papanicolaou stain with the standard papanicolaou stain in body fluids and fine needle aspiration specimens. J Lab Physicians (Internet). 2016;8(1):19 [DOI:10.4103/0974-2727.176229] [PMID] [PMCID]
  26. Sinkar P, Arakeri SU. Utility of modified ultrafast Papanicolaou stain in cytological diagnosis. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(3):EC28-EC31. [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2017/20882.9532] [PMID] [PMCID]