Noushin Afshar Moghaddam; Parvin Mahsuni; Diana Taheri
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Angiogenesis is essential for growth and metastasis of solid malignancies. Tumor vessel count and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic factor, have been associated with prognosis. This study was designed to assess vessels density by using ...
Read More
Background and Objectives: Angiogenesis is essential for growth and metastasis of solid malignancies. Tumor vessel count and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic factor, have been associated with prognosis. This study was designed to assess vessels density by using CD31 and CD105 (Endoglin) and their correlation with expression of VEGF and proliferative index (Ki67) in Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods: We examined these parameters in GBM specimens from 50 adult patients; referred to AlZahra hospital Pathology Lab between 2001 to 2006.These patients did not receive pre-operative therapy. Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were immunohistochemically stained for CD31, CD105 (Endoglin), VEGF and Ki67 (proliferation index) monoclonal antibodies. Microvessel density (MVD) was evaluated by immunostaining for CD31 and CD105.Then the results were compared between the two and also with VEGF receptors and Ki67 index. Results: CD105-MVD was significantly higher in Glioblastoma compared with peritumoral normal (14.28 vs. 6.68: P=0.012). We did not find such difference for CD31. The mean of CD105-MVD was significantly higher than CD31-MVD in Glioblastoma tissue (P<0.001) although there was a significant positive relationship between them (Pearson’s r=0.630 P<0.001).The VEGF scoring for tumoral tissue was 12 % (score:1), 46% (score:2) and 42% (score:3).For peritumoral normal tissue were 92% (score:1) and 8% (score:2) . So they reach to statistical significance (Chi Square, P= 001). Both MVD of CD105 and CD31 have significant relationship with VEGF (P<0.001). Conclusion: We suggest that Endoglin can be used as a specific and sensitive marker for evaluation of angiogenesis in Glioblastoma.
Mitra Mehrazma; Khadijeh Arjomandi Rafsanjani; Behzad Torkamanipoor
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Summer 2008, , Pages 179-182
Abstract
Background and Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGF-R1 and R2) are major regulators of angiogenesis. This study was designed to assess serum levels of VEGF and VEGF-R1 and their prognostic significance in newly diagnosed childhood acute leukemia. Materials ...
Read More
Background and Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGF-R1 and R2) are major regulators of angiogenesis. This study was designed to assess serum levels of VEGF and VEGF-R1 and their prognostic significance in newly diagnosed childhood acute leukemia. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, VEGF and VEGF-R1 were determined using enzyme linked immuno-sorbant assay (ELISA) in samples obtained before treatment. Demographic data were recorded. Bone marrow blast percentage was counted on diagnosis and 2 weeks after induction therapy. A p value less than 0.05 considered significant. Results: Fifty-three children (22 boys and 31 girls) with newly diagnosed acute leukemia were enrolled in the study. Most cases (56.6%) were pre B cell ALL. Mean value of VEFG-A in good responders was 55.13 ± 24.96 pg/ml and in poor responders it was 94.46 ± 15.75 (p<0.0001). Mean valve of VEGF-R1 in good and poor responders was 0.132 ± 0.0653 and 0.1665 ± 0.0857 pg/ml respectively (p>0.05). Using ROC curve, we found out a cut-off point of 76 pg/ml to discriminate poor response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: Soluble VEGF-A is an independent factor for response to therapy in childhood leukemia and leukemic patients with sVEGF-A level over 76 pg/ml will have poor response to treatment.
